ANALYSIS OF THE DISTRICT HEATING SYSTEM WITH THE SEASONAL THERMAL ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM TOGETHER WITH THE SYSTEM OF HYDROGEN PRODUCTION AND UTILISATION

Keywords: heating, hydrogen, renewable energy, seasonal thermal energy storage, geothermal energy.

Abstract

The aim of the article is to analyze the application of the district heating system using the underground seasonal thermal energy storage (STES) together with the system of production and consumption of hydrogen. The energy for both cases is provided by renewable energy sources (RES). Produced heat, electricity and hydrogen is used to provide energy for the residential buildings and related infrastructure. Regarding the ratio of heat supply of each system, the STES is the main source of heat supply, and the hydrogen system is an auxiliary energy source designed to provide heat consumption during the "peak" load of the district heating system. This paper shows the use of hydrogen due to the need to abandon conventional energy sources, in particular natural gas, as a “peak” and backup energy source of district heating systems.

Although the main part of the article is devoted to the issue of district heating systems, the paper also analyzes other elements of energy supply of residential buildings and related infrastructure. In particular, attention is paid to variable RES, which are characterized by the variable output of electricity and heat production through time, and their connection to the power grid. It is also shown how the excess electricity from RES serves as a source for hydrogen generation. The obtained hydrogen is to be used both for the hydrogen heating system and for the potential fuel supply of hydrogen vehicles. Since fuel cells are used in the process of heat generation from hydrogen utilization, in addition to heat, such systems are able to generate electricity.

The paper provides the classification of STES describing both their schemes and, their operational principles. Their comparison of different STES is also given. The preliminary analysis of the economic feasibility of the district heating systems with STES was conducted. It was done through the comparison of the current cost of the convenient district heating system, which uses natural gas in Ukraine, and the levelized cost of energy (LCOE) from the district heating system, which includes the STES. The economic analysis showed that in the case of Ukraine the LCEO of the district heating systems using borehole thermal energy storage is 80…200 % more expensive than the cost of the convenient district heating. At the same time, the LCOE of the district heating systems using pit thermal energy storage may be 20 % cheaper but the installation of such systems requires significant initial investment. Ref. 50, table. 3, fig 4.

Author Biography

O. Lysak, Institute of Renewable Energy, NAS of Ukraine 02094, 20A Hnata Khotkevycha Street, Kyiv, Ukraine

lysak.pngAuthor information: chief engineer at Institute for Renewable Energy, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine.
Education: graduated from Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture in 2011 with a degree on heat & gas supply and ventilation.
Research area: renewable energy sources, geothermal energy, heat storage systems.
Publications: more than 20.

References

1. Gielen D. et al. The role of renewable energy in the global energy transformation. Energy Strategy Reviews. 2019. Vol. 24. Pp. 38-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.01.006. [in English].
2. Widera B. Renewable hydrogen implementations for combined energy storage, transportation and stationary applications. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress. 2020. Vol. 16. Pp. 100460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2019.100460. [in English].
3. Hirth L. The market value of variable renewables. Energy Econ. 2013. Vol. 38. Pp. 218-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.02.004. [in English].
4. Bravo R., Friedrich D. Integration of energy storage with hybrid solar power plants. Energy Procedia. 2018. Vol. 151. Pp. 182-186. [in English].
5. Beckmann G., Gilli P.V. Teplovoe akkumulirovanie energii. [Thermal energy storage]. Mir. 1987. 272 p. [in Russian].
6. Matos C.R., Carneiro J.F., Silva P.P. Overview of Large-Scale Underground Energy Storage Technologies for Integration of Renewable Energies and Criteria for Reservoir Identification. Journal of Energy Storage. 2019. Vol. 21. Pp. 241-258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2018.11.023. [in English].
7. Karki S., Haapala K.R., Fronk B.M. Technical and economic feasibility of solar flat-plate collector thermal energy systems for small and medium manufacturers. Applied Energy. 2019. Vol. 254. Pp. 113649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.113649. [in English].
8. Mauthner F. IEA SHC Task 52: Solar Thermal and Energy Economy in Urban Environments: TECHNOLOGY AND DEMONSTRATORS Technical Report Subtask C – Part C1: Classification and benchmarking of solar thermal systems in urban environments. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://task52.iea-shc.org/Data/Sites/1/publications/IEA-SHC-Task52-STC1-Classification-and-Benchmarking_v02.pdf (Applying date: 09.06.2020). [in English].
9. Van der Roest E. et al. Introducing Power-to-H3: Combining renewable electricity with heat, water and hydrogen production and storage in a neighbourhood. Applied Energy. 2020. Vol. 257. Pp. 114024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114024. [in English].
10. Mesquita L. et al. Drake Landing Solar Community: 10 Years of Operation. Proceedings of SWC2017/SHC2017. Freiburg. Germany. International Solar Energy Society. 2017. Pp. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.18086/swc.2017.06.09. [in English].
11. Dawood F., Anda M., Shafiullah G.M. Hydrogen production for energy: An overview. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2020. Vol. 45. No. 7. Pp. 3847-3869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.12.059. [in English].
12. Crowl D.A., Jo Y.-D. The hazards and risks of hydrogen. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2007. Vol. 20. No. 2. Pp. 158-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2007.02.002. [in English].
13. Dodds P.E. et al. Hydrogen and fuel cell technologies for heating. A review. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2015. Vol. 40. No. 5. Pp. 2065-2083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.11.059. [in English].
14. Nastasi B., Lo Basso G. Hydrogen to link heat and electricity in the transition towards future Smart Energy Systems. Energy. 2016. Vol. 110. Pp. 5-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.03.097. [in English].
15. Hydrogen Council: Path to hydrogen competitiveness A cost perspective: 20 January 2020. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://hydrogencouncil.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Path-to-Hydrogen-Competitiveness_Full-Study-1.pdf. (Applying date: 09.06.2020). [in English].
16. Ellamla H.R. et al. Current status of fuel cell based combined heat and power systems for residential sector. J. Power Sources. 2015. Vol. 293. Pp. 312-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.05.050. [in English].
17. Development of FPS (fuel processing system) for ENE-FARM. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.tokyo-gas.co.jp/techno/english/category1/5_index_detail.html. (Applying date: 10.06.2020). [in English].
18. Wilberforce T. et al. Developments of electric cars and fuel cell hydrogen electric cars. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 2017. Vol. 42. No. 40. Pp. 25695-25734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.07.054. [in English].
19. Battery or fuel cell, that is the question. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.volkswagen-newsroom.com/en/stories/battery-or-fuel-cell-that-is-the-question-5868. (Applying date: 12.06.2020). [in English].
20. Hyundai Hydrogen Chief on Why the Company Bet on Fuel Cells. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-06-09/hyundai-s-hydrogen-chief-on-why-the-auto-giant-bet-on-fuel-cells. (Applying date: 12.06.2020). [in English].
21. Sharma A. et al. Review on thermal energy storage with phase change materials and applications. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2009. Vol. 13. No. 2. Pp. 318-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2007.10.005. [in English].
22. Mehling H., Cabeza L.F. Heat and cold storage with PCM. Berlin. Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68557-9. [in English].
23. Zalba B. et al. Review on thermal energy storage with phase change: materials, heat transfer analysis and applications. Applied Thermal Engineering. 2003. Vol. 23. No. 3. Pp. 251-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-4311(02)00192-8. [in English].
24. Lizana J. et al. Advances in thermal energy storage materials and their applications towards zero energy buildings: A critical review. Applied Energy. 2017. Vol. 203. Pp. 219-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.06.008. [in English].
25. Shah S.K., Aye L., Rismanchi B. Seasonal thermal energy storage system for cold climate zones: A review of recent developments. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2018. Vol. 97. Pp. 38-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.08.025. [in English].
26. Xu J., Wang R.Z., Li Y. A review of available technologies for seasonal thermal energy storage. Solar Energy. 2014. Vol. 103. Pp. 610-638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2013.06.006. [in English].
27. Hesaraki A., Holmberg S., Haghighat F. Seasonal thermal energy storage with heat pumps and low temperatures in building projects. A comparative review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2015. Vol. 43. Pp. 1199-1213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.12.002. [in English].
28. Bedouani B.Y. et al. Central electric thermal storage (ETS) feasibility for residential applications: Part 2. Techno-economic study. International Journal of Energy Research. 2001. Vol. 25. No. 1. Pp. 73-83. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-114X(200101)25:1<73::AID-ER611>3.0.CO;2-K. [in English].
29. Cruickshank A.C., Baldwin C. Sensible Thermal Energy Storage: Diurnal and Seasonal. Storing Energy. Elsevier. 2016. Pp. 291-311. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-803440-8.00015-4. [in English].
30. Mangold D., Deschaintre L. Seasonal thermal energy storage : Report on state of the art and necessary further R+D. [Electronic resource]. URL: http://task45.iea-shc.org/data/sites/1/publications/IEA_SHC_Task45_B_Report.pdf (Applying date: 12.05.2020). [in English].
31. Guideline for Seasonal Thermal Energy Storage in the Built Environment. [Electronic resource]. URL: http://www.ectp.org/fileadmin/user_upload/documents/E2B/EINSTEIN/einstein-guidelines_stes-tanks-del-38.pdf. (Applying date: 12.05.2020). [in English].
32. Rad F.M., Fung A.S. Solar community heating and cooling system with borehole thermal energy storage – Review of systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2016. Vol. 60. Pp. 1550-1561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.03.025. [in English].
33. Schmidt T., Mangold D., Müller-Steinhagen H. Seasonal thermal energy storage in Germany. ISES Solar World Congress. 14-19 June. Göteborg. Schweden. 2003. [in English].
34. Fleuchaus P. et al. Worldwide application of aquifer thermal energy storage. A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2018. Vol. 94. Pp. 861-876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.06.057. [in English].
35. Lanahan M., Tabares-Velasco P.C. Seasonal Thermal-Energy Storage: A Critical Review on BTES Systems, Modeling, and System Design for Higher System Efficiency. Energies. 2017. Vol. 10. No. 6. 743 p. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10060743. [in English].
36. Ebrahimi M., Keshavarz A. CCHP Thermal Energy Storage. Combined Cooling, Heating and Power. Elsevier. 2015. Pp. 183-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-099985-2.00008-1. [in English].
37. Sommer W.T. et al. Thermal performance and heat transport in aquifer thermal energy storage. Hydrogeology Journal. 2014. Vol. 22. No. 1. Pp. 263-279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-013-1066-0. [in English].
38. Gao L. et al. A review on system performance studies of aquifer thermal energy storage. Energy Procedia. 2017. Vol. 142. Pp. 3537-3545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.242. [in English].
39. Sibbit B. et al. Groundbreaking Solar Case Study: Drake Landing Solar Community. High Performing Buildings. 2015. [in English].
40. Sibbitt B. et al. The Performance of a High Solar Fraction Seasonal Storage District Heating System – Five Years of Operation. Energy Procedia. 2012. Vol. 30. Pp. 856-865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2012.11.097. [in English].
41. Pardo García N. et al. Photovoltaic thermal hybrid solar collector and district heating configurations for a Central European multi-family house. Energy Conversion and Management. 2017. Vol. 148. Pp. 915-924. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.05.065. [in English].
42. Khelifa A. et al. Analysis of a Hybrid Solar Collector Photovoltaic Thermal (PVT). Energy Procedia. 2015. Vol. 74. Pp. 835-843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.819. [in English].
43. Q & A: DLR’s Christian Sattler on the Role of Solar Thermochemistry in Green Hydrogen Production. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.solarpaces.org/csp-efficient-solar-split-h2o-hydrogen/. (Applying date: 07.06.2020). [in English].
44. Huang J. et al. Economic analysis and optimization of combined solar district heating technologies and systems. Energy. 2019. Vol. 186. 115886 p. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.115886. [in English].
45. Denmark: 23 MWth Cover 55% of Heat Demand of 1,500 Households. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://www.solarthermalworld.org/news/denmark-23-mwth-cover-55-heat-demand-1500-households. (Applying date: 15.06.2020). [in English].
46. Tian Z. et al. Large-scale solar district heating plants in Danish smart thermal grid: Developments and recent trends. Energy Conversion and Management. 2019. Vol. 189. Pp. 67-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.03.071. [in English].
47. Tschopp D. et al. Large-scale solar thermal systems in leading countries: A review and comparative study of Denmark, China, Germany and Austria. Applied Energy 2020. Vol. 270. 114997 p. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114997. [in English].
48. Zahalnoukrainska informatsiia ta statystychna informatsiia yevropeiskykh instytutsii u sferi tsentralizovanoho opalennia ta tsentralizovanoho postachannia hariachoi vody. [All-Ukrainian information and statistical information of European institutions in the field of district heating and centralized hot water supply]. [Electronic resource]. URL:http://www.nerc.gov.ua/?id=39305. (Applying date: 12.06.2020). [in Ukrainian].
49. Kyivteploenerho: Z sichnia 2019 roku v KP «Kyivteploenerho» diiut novi taryfy na tsentralizovane postachannia hariachoi vody ta tsentralizovane opalennia. [Kyivteploenerho: Since January 2019, municipally owned corporation Kyivteploenerho has introduced new tariffs for district hot water supply and district heating]. [Electronic resource]. URL: https://kte.kmda.gov.ua/z-sichnya-2019-roku-v-kp-kyyivteploenergo-diyut-novi-taryfy-na-tsentralizovane-postachannya-garyachoyi-vody-ta-tsentralizovane-opalennya/. (Applying date: 09.06.2020). [in Ukrainian].
50. Narula K. et al. Assessment of techno-economic feasibility of centralised seasonal thermal energy storage for decarbonising the Swiss residential heating sector. Renewable Energy. 2020. Vol. 161. Pp. 1209-1225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.06.099. [in English].

Abstract views: 31
PDF Downloads: 10
Published
2020-09-28
How to Cite
Lysak, O. (2020). ANALYSIS OF THE DISTRICT HEATING SYSTEM WITH THE SEASONAL THERMAL ENERGY STORAGE SYSTEM TOGETHER WITH THE SYSTEM OF HYDROGEN PRODUCTION AND UTILISATION. Vidnovluvana Energetika, (3(62), 70-88. https://doi.org/10.36296/1819-8058.2020.3(62).70-88