INFLUENCE OF RATIO BETWEEN INOCULUM AND ORGANIC SUBSTRATE ON THE YIELD OF BIOGAS

Keywords: biogas, methane potential, organic substrate, inoculum, digestion

Abstract

Determining a methane potential of organic substrates is an important task at the design stage of biogas complex, plants or stations. The raw substrates differ in their composition throughout the year especially those that contain droppings or manure. Therefore laboratories are usually set up at biogas plants to check the characteristics of the raw substrate and perform test to determine its methane potential. The aim of the work is to research the yield of biogas depending on the ratio between the inoculum and the substrate. The condition under which the value of the ratio between inoculum and substrate can be considered rational is given, namely: it is necessary that the deviation of the value of biogas yield was insignificant relative to small changes in the ratio between inoculum and substrate. The results of experiments on methane anaerobic conversion of cow manure at different values of the ratio between inoculum and cow manure are presented. The yield and composition of biogas and the degree of degradation of volatile solids have been determined. The optimal value of the ratio between the inoculum and the cow manure has been determined. The necessity of substrate mixing during methane potential test in laboratory conditions was analyzed. It has been found that for organic substrates that are easily digested or sufficiently diluted with water, it is sufficient to shake the contents of the reactor manually once a day. If the organic substrate is composed of components that are difficult to digest or the organic substrate contains a high amount of dry matter, mixing is mandatory. The mixing method for the test for methane potential of organic substrates containing cow manure is given. There are two criteria according to which the choice of the ratio between the inoculum and the substrate for different types of organic substrates when determining their methane potential should be performed: the first criterion is the presence of its own cell biomass in the substrate; the second criterion is the presence of mostly easily fermentable components in the substrate. The required values of the ratio between the inoculum and the substrate are recommended for organic substrates that are promising and can be primarily used in biogas plants. Bibl. 20, table  3, fig. 1.

Author Biographies

H. Chetveryk, Institute of Renewable Energy of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 02094, 20А Hnata Khotkevycha St., Kyiv, Ukraine.

chetverik1.pngAuthor information: Institute of Renewable Energy of NAS of Ukraine, senior researcher. PhD since 2019 year.
Education: Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Faculty of Mechanics and Mathematics.
Research area: biogas, organic waste utilization.
Publications: 52 scientific publications, including 3 patents.

N. Maslova, Institute of Renewable Energy of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 02094, 20A Hnata Khotkevycha St., Kyiv, Ukraine.

maslova2.pngAuthor information:  Institute of Renewable Energy of NAS of Ukraine, junior research fellow
Education: Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Faculty of Chemistry
Research area: bioenergy, gasification of biomass, organic waste utilization
Publications: more than 20 scientific publications

References

. Eshore S., Mondal C., Das A. Production of biogas from treated sugarcane bagasse. International Journal of Scientific Engineering and Technology. 2017. Vol. 6. Iss. 7. Pp. 224–227. [in English].
2. Miah M., Rahman A., Kalam A. Production of biogas from poultry litter mixed with the co-substrate cow dung. Journal of Taibah University for Science. 2016. Vol. 10. Iss. 4. Pp. 497–504. [in English].
3. Gaworski M., Jablonski S. Enhancing biogas plant production using pig manure and corn silage by adding wheat straw processed with liquid hot water and steam explosion. Biotechnol. Biofuels. 2017. Vol. 10. Pp. 259–271. [in English].
4. Angelidaki I., Ahring B. Thermophilic anaerobic digestion of livestock waste: the effect of ammonia. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1993. Vol. 38. Pp. 560–564. [in English].
5. Lindmark J., Eriksson P., Thorin E. The effects of different mixing intensities during anaerobic digestion of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Waste Management. 2014. Vol. 34. Pp. 1391–1397. [in English].
6. Pecorini I, Baldi F, Carnevale E., Corti A. Biochemical methane potential tests of different autoclaved and microwaved lignocellulosic organic fractions of municipal solid waste. Waste Management. 2016. Vol. 56. Pр. 143–150. [in English].
7. ISO-11734. Water quality. Evaluation of the "ultimate" anaerobic biodegradability of organic compounds in digested sludge. Method by measurement of the biogas production. Geneva. 1995. [in English].
8. ISO-14853. Plastics-Determination of the ultimate anaerobic biodegradation of plastic materials in an aqueous system-Method by measurement of biogas production. London. British Standards Institute. 2005. [in English].
9. ASTM-D5210. Standard test method for determining the anaerobic biodegradation of plastic materials in the presence of municipal sewage sludge. West Conshohocken. Pennsylvania. 2007. [in English].
10. ASTM-E2710. Standard test method for determining anaerobic biodegradation potential of organic chemicals under methanogenic conditions. West Conshohocken. Pennsylvania. 2008. [in English].
11. VDI 4630. Fermentation of organic materials. Characterisation of the substrate, sampling, collection of material data, fermentation tests. Dusseldorf: Verein Deutscher Ingenieure. 2016. [in English].
12. Automatical methane potential test system. Operation and maintenance manual. Lund. Bioprocess control Sweden AB. 2016. 95 p. [in English].
13. Chetveryk H.O. Energoefektyvne peretvorennia ridkyh vidhodiv hazyfikacii biomasy v biohazoviy ustanovci. [Energy efficient conversion of liquid waste from biomass gasification in the biogas plant, abstract of the candidate of technical sciences]. Avtoref. dys. na zdobuttya nauk. stupenya kand. tekhn. nauk spets. 05.14.08. К. 2018. 21 p. [in Ukrainian].
14. DSTU EN 12048:2005. Dobryva tverdi ta vapnuvalʹni materialy. Vyznachennya vmistu volohy hravimetrychnym metodom. Vysushuvannya za temperatury 105±2 °C. [State Standard EN 12048:2005. Fertilizers for solid and lime materials. Determination of moisture content by gravimetric method. Drying at 105 ± 2 °С]. State Committee of Ukraine for Technical Regula-tion and Consumer Policy Publ. Кyiv. 2006. [in Ukrainian]
15. GOST 26714–85. Udobreniya organicheskie. Metod opredeleniya zoly. M. Gosudarstvennyy komitet SSSR po standartam, 1987. 8 p. [in Russian].
16. Holliger C., et al. Towards a standardization of biomethane potential tests: a commernaty. Water Science and technology. 2021. Vol. 83. No. 1. Pp. 247–250 [in English].
17. Raposo F. Biochemical methane potential of solid organic substrates: evaluation of anaerobic biodegradability using data from an international laboratory study. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2011. Vol. 86. Pp. 1088–1098. [in English].
18. Wang B. Factors that influence the biochemical methane potential (BMP) test steps towards the standardization of bmp test. avtoref. of doctoral dissertation. Lund University. 2020. 48 p. [in English].
19. Zhang R., Hamed M., Hartman K., et al. Characterization of food waste as feedstock for anaerobic digestion. Bioresource Technology. 2007. No. 98. Pp. 929–935. [in English].
20. Dague R., McKinney R., Pfeffer J. Solids retention in anaerobic waste treatment systems. Journal Water Pollution Control Federation. 1970. Vol. 42. No. 2. Pp. 29–46. [in English].

Abstract views: 20
PDF Downloads: 19
Published
2021-09-30
How to Cite
Chetveryk, H., & Maslova, N. (2021). INFLUENCE OF RATIO BETWEEN INOCULUM AND ORGANIC SUBSTRATE ON THE YIELD OF BIOGAS. Vidnovluvana Energetika, (3(66), 88-98. https://doi.org/10.36296/1819-8058.2021.3(66).88-98