COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THE EFFICIENCY OF SOLAR TRACKING WITH UNIAXIAL TRACKING DEVICE

Keywords: solar energy, tracker, modeling, illumination, exposure, efficiency

Abstract

Estimates of the efficiency of solar installations in the Sun tracking mode presented in the literature are often ambiguous due to non-identical comparison criteria and irradiation conditions. It is proposed to evaluate this characteristic systematically by two indicators - orientation and energy. The first is numerically equal to the current value of the cosine of the illumination angle of the receiving surface. And the second - the daily exposure of the tracking surface, attributed to the maximum value with ideal tracking of the Sun by a biaxial rotary device. Both indicators are calculated under the assumption of irradiation with three streams of solar energy in clear skies, which change during the day according to the model of the European Solar Radiation Atlas (ESRA).

Spatially temporal parameters of insolation of the tracking surface are determined for the site at latitudes of 50o and the longest day of the summer solstice. The limitations imposed by the orientation of the axis of rotation are clearly illustrated by spatial schemes of illumination of the tracking surface of 4 types of uniaxial rotary devices. They are easier to track the analytical relationship between the angular displacements of the Sun and the normal of the tracking surface to ensure maximum current illumination.

The relationships between the fluxes of solar radiation at different atmospheric states are taken into account by the Linke turbidity factor. The unit of comparison of the efficiency of uniaxial tracking is the daily exposure of the surface the biaxial tracking device, the angle of illumination of which during the day is zero. Four variants of estimation of efficiency concerning direct and full streams of solar radiation at two variants of distribution of brightness of the sky - isotropic and non-isotropic in the Hay-Davies model approximation are considered. The simulation results are presented in tabular and graphical forms.

Ref. 13, Tab. 1, Fig. 7.

References

Renewables 2021 Global Status Report. Paris: REN21 Secretariat. 2021. 371 p.

Chia-Yen Lee, Po-Cheng Chou, Che-Ming Chiang and Chiu-Feng Lin. Sun Tracking Systems: A Review. Sensors, 2009, 9, 3875-3890.

Georgios A. Vokas, Georgios Ch. Zoridis, Konstantinos V. Lagogiannis. Single and dual axis PV energy production over Greece: Comparison between measured and predicted data. Energy Procedia, 74, 2015. 1490 – 1498.

Bouziane Khadidja, Korichi Dris, Azoui Boubeker, Settou Noureddine. Optimisation of a Solar Tracker System for Photovoltaic Power Plants in Saharian region, Example of Ouargla. Energy Procedia, 50, 2014. 610 – 618.

Tamer Khatib, Wilfried Elmenreich. Modeling of photovoltaic systems using matlab. Publ. by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, 2016. р. 225.

Scharmer K., Greif J. The European Solar Radiation At-las. Vol. 1. Paris. Les Presses de l’École des Mines. 2000. 98 p.

Rigollier C., Bauer О., Wald L. On the clear sky model of the ESRA - European Solar Radiation Atlas with respect to the Heliosat method. Solar Energy. Elsevier. 2000. No. 68(1). Pp.33-48. URL: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00361373. Submitted on 13 Feb 2009.

Halʹchak V. P., Boyarchuk V. M., Syrotyuk V. M., Syrotyuk S. V. Parametry pryamoho potoku sonyachnoyi enerhiyi pry yasnomu nebi z urakhuvannyam prozorosti atmosfery. Vidnovlyuvana enerhetyka. 2019. № 2. s. 22-31. [in Ukr.]. https://doi.org/10.36296/1819-8058.2019.2(57).22-31

Pérez-Burgos A., Díez-Mediavilla M., Alonso-Tristán C., and Rodríguez-Amigo M. C. Analysis of solar direct irradiance models under clear-skies: Evaluation of the improvements for locally adapted models. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy 9, 2017, 023703.

Duffie J. А., Beckmаn W. А. Solar engineering of thermal processes. 4ed. Copyright 2013 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey. p. 910.

Kalogirou S. A. Solar Energy Engineering. Processes and Systems. Second Edition. Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc., 2014. р. 819.

Andriyevsʹkyy S. M., Klymyshyn I. A. Kurs zahalʹnoyi astronomiyi. Odesa: Astroprynt, 2007. 480 s. [in Ukr.].

Zharov V. Ye. Sfericheskaya astronomiya. Fryazino, 2006. 480 s. [in Rus.].


Abstract views: 9
PDF Downloads: 4
Published
2022-09-20
How to Cite
Syrotyuk, S., Halchak, V., Boyarchuk, V., Korobka, S., & Syrotiuk, V. (2022). COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF THE EFFICIENCY OF SOLAR TRACKING WITH UNIAXIAL TRACKING DEVICE. Vidnovliuvana Energetyka, (2(69), 32-40. https://doi.org/10.36296/1819-8058.2022.2(69)854